S-Chassis Annoucements Discuss our latest site announcements.

Need new picture for front page!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 01:11 AM
  #61  
yarou's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 501
From: San Francisco, CA
Put an s10 in the front and forget this argument ever happened

Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #62  
Ayuaddict's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,096
From: San Jose, CA
why dont we bring back ROTM and have that car up there for that month? and change it every month? it wouldnt be much work, ****, i dont even mind switching out the pics and filling in info on the car every month.
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 09:42 AM
  #63  
USMCDrifter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,684
From: Alpharetta, GA
because I'll never win

-Stig
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #64  
RuizXIII's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,653
From: New Jersey!
Originally Posted by Ayuaddict
why dont we bring back ROTM and have that car up there for that month? and change it every month? it wouldnt be much work, ****, i dont even mind switching out the pics and filling in info on the car every month.
Thats what I've been saying since like 1997. **** Yes!
It would make us all feel special too.
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #65  
neville610135's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 237
From: Central Coast, CA
Originally Posted by Ayuaddict
why dont we bring back ROTM and have that car up there for that month? and change it every month? it wouldnt be much work, ****, i dont even mind switching out the pics and filling in info on the car every month.
says one of the winners....
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #66  
silviaks2nr's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,273
From: NC
ROTM sounds like a good idea
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 06:27 PM
  #67  
Ayuaddict's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,096
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by neville610135
says one of the winners....
thanks for pointing that out,

you cant win ROTM twice, and i sold my 240 a while back.

lots of innitiative there for me.
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 07:39 PM
  #68  
battosaii930's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,312
From: Miami, FL
well we better start getting alot more members because eventually all of us will have won ROTM at some point then anyone that signs up will be ROTM lol
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #69  
battosaii930's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,312
From: Miami, FL
instead of never being able to win rwice with the same car maybe we should make it so that you can only win once a year, most peoples cars make alot of progress in a years time. just throwing out an idea that might help with the picture if we take this path
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #70  
Ayuaddict's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,096
From: San Jose, CA
that a good idea,

a car can win only once a year.

so if you have two S chassis cars, you can win up to twice an year.

hmmm...

any other rules or suggestions?
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:12 PM
  #71  
jramosthe1st!'s Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,324
From: kennewick wa.
Originally Posted by Ayuaddict
that a good idea,

a car can win only once a year.

so if you have two S chassis cars, you can win up to twice an year.

hmmm...

any other rules or suggestions?

if something comes of this a stipulation should be that the winner needs to be an active member. you know someone that posts here like at least twice a week or so. other than that i don't really care.
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:12 PM
  #72  
battosaii930's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,312
From: Miami, FL
hmm well if you spent all that time and effort on each car i think it would be worthy i dunno im just throwing some ideas into the air
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:14 PM
  #73  
battosaii930's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,312
From: Miami, FL
i do agree that all nominee's for ROTM should be active members
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 09:29 PM
  #74  
ryguy's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,288
From: Highland, IN (Chicago)
I have an idea. How about we don't have a ROTM. I'll be the voice of reason and point out that it didnt really work before because of the smaller number of members and lack of outside interest.
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 09:32 PM
  #75  
Ayuaddict's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,096
From: San Jose, CA
well maybe we could try after we have a decent amount of members?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 PM.