Engine Swaps Discussion about motor swaps ONLY.

CA18det for 1989 240sx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 07:21 PM
  #1  
black240sx1987's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
CA18det for 1989 240sx

I have a 1989 240sx and am looking to make a motor swap. I dont want the SR motor since everyone else has done that. I was wondering what all would I need to do to swap a CA18DET, or a CA18de. I heard that they are both pretty much able to go into a 1989 240sx quite easily, but i was just wondering. Should i buy a used one and rebuild it or should i just find one with like 35,000 miles. Thanks a lot
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #2  
Waynehead05's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,110
From: Dallas
the swap process and directions are identical to an sr swap.... everything you need to do an sr swap... you need to do a CA swap.
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 10:16 PM
  #3  
jbask's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 224
From: Kelowna
Every one has the sr for a reason
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 08:15 AM
  #4  
Shri222's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 231
From: NJ
Originally posted by jbask
Every one has the sr for a reason
how you figger, CA is stronger then a SR, cast iron baby lol jk
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 02:46 PM
  #5  
Waynehead05's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,110
From: Dallas
Originally posted by Shri222
how you figger, CA is stronger then a SR, cast iron baby lol jk
BS the CA can only hold 475 hp. the sr has reached the 800 mark in japan.
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #6  
Shri222's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 231
From: NJ
CA only reached 475 cause no one ever spent time building one right like a 800hp SR , a CA can be made in to a 2.0L very easlly and sleved from what i've looked into. And i plan on doing that> I can afford a SR, but i went CA, everyone dose a SR dosn't make it right. Plus I want to be differnt.
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 10:24 AM
  #7  
BigVinnie's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,502
From: Walnut Creek
Originally posted by Shri222
CA only reached 475 cause no one ever spent time building one right like a 800hp SR , a CA can be made in to a 2.0L very easlly and sleved from what i've looked into. And i plan on doing that> I can afford a SR, but i went CA, everyone dose a SR dosn't make it right. Plus I want to be differnt.
If you wanted to be cheap and different you could of done a 2.2litre NAPSZ with KAE head and got high rev to 8500RPM. Kept your ecu,transmission, mounts, and wiring harness and got your basic KA e kit for under $1200. THATS ORIGINAL! THATS TIGHT! CA's are mega booboo, to get that 2.0 displacement you would have to order a stroker kit anyways, and do some headwork if you planned on boosting big numbers.
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:31 PM
  #8  
Shri222's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 231
From: NJ
^^ well not really but i'm not gonna let out all my secrets either. To each their own, once my CA is done i should have more then 2.0L displacement. And work isn't a big deal we all mechanics over here =) I do more bodyworkl, but i got good friends. and as far as stroker, i plan to use a doner CA20E, custom rods and pistons. I know a couple good machine shops that wont rape me. And i didn't get a CA because it was cheaper, i've never scene one fully built.

Last edited by Shri222; Sep 22, 2005 at 08:33 PM.
Old Sep 24, 2005 | 10:15 PM
  #9  
Waynehead05's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,110
From: Dallas
at a 1.8L the engine can't hold anymore than 475ish hp. untill i'm proven wrong you can't call me wrong. and yes i've seen video of a fully built one. didn't spool till 5.5 rpms

i understand you on the different thing. i'm still debating KA-t or RB20det because i don't wish to build the engine anytime soon. KA can only handle 250ish with good fuel support. rb is like 320ish i think with good fuel support.
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #10  
iroc07's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 732
From: PA
RB20 has been proven to 400ish, thats even been mentioned on this forum a few times. I have one thats easily cranking over 300 and I have barely done anything to it. its still on stock turbo and injectors, and even stock SIDE MOUNT! boost controller, and custom made water sprayer, just got to be carefull not to beat on it too much cause that is not the best way to get power. I only did it that way cause I wanted to see how an RB motors charactaristics change when you boost it higher.
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 02:48 AM
  #11  
ArticDragon's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,515
From: West Covina/ Irvine
A CA has hit 650 rwhp in Japan just so you know.
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #12  
swingking's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29
From: atlanta
b18c1!!!!!!! im kidding lol-(please dont kick my ***)
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #13  
swingking's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29
From: atlanta
b18c1!!!!!!! im kidding lol-(please dont kick my ***)
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #14  
swingking's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29
From: atlanta
b18c1!!!!!!! im kidding lol-(please dont kick my ***)
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #15  
swingking's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29
From: atlanta
b18c1!!!!!!! im kidding lol-(please dont kick my ***)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 PM.