Engine Swaps Discussion about motor swaps ONLY.

rb26 vs. ka24

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 10:36 PM
  #1  
slepper13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13
From: bakersfield ca
rb26 vs. ka24

is a rb26 isn't very much better than a ka24 without its turbos.
isn't heavier to?
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 12:11 AM
  #2  
Helghast's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 986
From: Anaheim Hills.
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 01:57 AM
  #3  
Bryan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,440
From: Harrisburg, PA
are you saying it isn't much better or are you asking is it better than the KA?

Heres a little comparison:

RB26DE

Capacity - 2.568L
Valve Train - DOHC
Cylinders: Inline 6
Maximum Power - 162kW @ 6800rpm (using a online converter, it says this is 217.16 hp)
Maximum Torque - 245Nm @ 5200rpm (using another online converter, it says this is 180.71 ft/lbs)
KA24DE
Capacity - 2.4L
Valve Train - DOHC
Cylinders - Inline 4
Maximum Power - 155hp @ 5600rpm
Maximum Torque - 160 ft/lbs @ 4400rpms
The only RB26DE that I've really heard of is from a company called Autech who had one in a 4 door R32...don't really see it all that often...
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 04:04 AM
  #4  
jonpowell's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 609
From: Albany, NY
You are right, stick with the KA...its MUCH better!
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 10:52 AM
  #5  
slepper13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13
From: bakersfield ca
the rb has 6 cylinders ka has 4. rb has a little more displacement. so if u bolted on a turbo on ka it would up with the rb. the ka has better torque for its size.
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 11:47 AM
  #6  
Bryan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,440
From: Harrisburg, PA
Again, who gets an RB26DETT and dumps both turbos? Sure a whole bunch of people switch up for a larger single turbo, but its extremely rare to see someone rip them off all together.

In actuality, comparing a KA to an RB26 is like comparing apples to oranges. Both engines have great potential, but realistically the RB is going to come with turbos, and the RB is going to be a better engine to make power with.

Most of the flaws you can pick out like the weight differences can be somewhat balanced out by doing other things, like relocating the battery to the rear, wont balance it out completely but will help some.

I dunno, I'm tired...
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 12:57 PM
  #7  
Levi SPL S14's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,383
From: Here and there, mostly here.
Originally posted by slepper13
the rb has 6 cylinders ka has 4. rb has a little more displacement. so if u bolted on a turbo on ka it would up with the rb. the ka has better torque for its size.
wow okay let me get this right so if i turbo my ka i can hang with an RB???

Whao WAY WRONG let see. RB has way better internals for HIGH boost applications. Umm Excellent Head design for better flow. Is basically a built motor stock and HAS 2 MORE CYLINDERS and can rev to 9000RPM!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wow the RB has the KA beat by a long shot.

HAHA ka has better torque for its size hahahah.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Seriously this is like comparing angry to yellow you cant.

What about F1 engines to a KA? F1 is only 3.0 with 10 cylinders that can rev to 16000rpm. Its only .6 more liters I ALMOST HAVE AN F1 ENGINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So you should stop posting. On this thread.
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #8  
2fast4y0u's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,254
From: Chicago area
the rb26 can rev to 9000? what the hell was i thinking about when i bought a sr20. geez
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #9  
CowboyTurbo's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,703
From: MA
Originally posted by 2fast4y0u
the rb26 can rev to 9000? what the hell was i thinking about when i bought a sr20. geez
ROFLMAO!!! Not at your circumstances, but this comment had my kidneys hurting I was laughing so hard.
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 02:23 PM
  #10  
jonpowell's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 609
From: Albany, NY
What about F1 engines to a KA? F1 is only 3.0 with 10 cylinders that can rev to 16000rpm. Its only .6 more liters I ALMOST HAVE AN F1 ENGINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wait until next year when the teams are running 2.4L V8's going OVER 20,000RPM....Then the KA can hang for sure!
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 02:37 PM
  #11  
Levi SPL S14's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,383
From: Here and there, mostly here.
WOO HOO!!!!!!!!
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 05:51 PM
  #12  
SHIFT_Sideways's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 330
From: for you to ask....PM me
Originally posted by slepper13
the rb has 6 cylinders ka has 4. rb has a little more displacement. so if u bolted on a turbo on ka it would up with the rb. the ka has better torque for its size.
hahhaa all i can is wow and go search if your not sure which engine or better.
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #13  
Fast1One's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,863
From: Waterford, Ca
This thread is great....but I know my KA will KILL an Rb. It has an intake
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:54 PM
  #14  
donteventry's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 394
From: Brunswick
O deffinately if you put like an intake filter even youll be able to smoke the RBs and probably rev faster, hell itll even sound better...hahahhahahhahahhahahahaha. God i love newbs
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 06:47 PM
  #15  
CowboyTurbo's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,703
From: MA
the type )2 badges on my intake make it faster than NOS!!!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:14 AM.