rb26 vs. ka24
06-19-2005, 10:36 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: bakersfield ca
Posts: 13
rb26 vs. ka24
is a rb26 isn't very much better than a ka24 without its turbos.
isn't heavier to?
isn't heavier to?
06-20-2005, 01:57 AM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 8,440
are you saying it isn't much better or are you asking is it better than the KA?
Heres a little comparison:
The only RB26DE that I've really heard of is from a company called Autech who had one in a 4 door R32...don't really see it all that often...
Heres a little comparison:
RB26DE
Capacity - 2.568L
Valve Train - DOHC
Cylinders: Inline 6
Maximum Power - 162kW @ 6800rpm (using a online converter, it says this is 217.16 hp)
Maximum Torque - 245Nm @ 5200rpm (using another online converter, it says this is 180.71 ft/lbs)
Capacity - 2.568L
Valve Train - DOHC
Cylinders: Inline 6
Maximum Power - 162kW @ 6800rpm (using a online converter, it says this is 217.16 hp)
Maximum Torque - 245Nm @ 5200rpm (using another online converter, it says this is 180.71 ft/lbs)
KA24DE
Capacity - 2.4L
Valve Train - DOHC
Cylinders - Inline 4
Maximum Power - 155hp @ 5600rpm
Maximum Torque - 160 ft/lbs @ 4400rpms
Capacity - 2.4L
Valve Train - DOHC
Cylinders - Inline 4
Maximum Power - 155hp @ 5600rpm
Maximum Torque - 160 ft/lbs @ 4400rpms
06-20-2005, 04:04 AM
#4
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 609
You are right, stick with the KA...its MUCH better!
06-20-2005, 10:52 AM
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: bakersfield ca
Posts: 13
the rb has 6 cylinders ka has 4. rb has a little more displacement. so if u bolted on a turbo on ka it would up with the rb. the ka has better torque for its size.
06-20-2005, 11:47 AM
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 8,440
Again, who gets an RB26DETT and dumps both turbos? Sure a whole bunch of people switch up for a larger single turbo, but its extremely rare to see someone rip them off all together.
In actuality, comparing a KA to an RB26 is like comparing apples to oranges. Both engines have great potential, but realistically the RB is going to come with turbos, and the RB is going to be a better engine to make power with.
Most of the flaws you can pick out like the weight differences can be somewhat balanced out by doing other things, like relocating the battery to the rear, wont balance it out completely but will help some.
I dunno, I'm tired...
In actuality, comparing a KA to an RB26 is like comparing apples to oranges. Both engines have great potential, but realistically the RB is going to come with turbos, and the RB is going to be a better engine to make power with.
Most of the flaws you can pick out like the weight differences can be somewhat balanced out by doing other things, like relocating the battery to the rear, wont balance it out completely but will help some.
I dunno, I'm tired...
06-20-2005, 12:57 PM
#7
Contributing Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Here and there, mostly here.
Posts: 2,383
Originally posted by slepper13
the rb has 6 cylinders ka has 4. rb has a little more displacement. so if u bolted on a turbo on ka it would up with the rb. the ka has better torque for its size.
the rb has 6 cylinders ka has 4. rb has a little more displacement. so if u bolted on a turbo on ka it would up with the rb. the ka has better torque for its size.
Whao WAY WRONG let see. RB has way better internals for HIGH boost applications. Umm Excellent Head design for better flow. Is basically a built motor stock and HAS 2 MORE CYLINDERS and can rev to 9000RPM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow the RB has the KA beat by a long shot.
HAHA ka has better torque for its size hahahah.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Seriously this is like comparing angry to yellow you cant.
What about F1 engines to a KA? F1 is only 3.0 with 10 cylinders that can rev to 16000rpm. Its only .6 more liters I ALMOST HAVE AN F1 ENGINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So you should stop posting. On this thread.
06-20-2005, 01:26 PM
#8
Contributing Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,254
the rb26 can rev to 9000? what the hell was i thinking about when i bought a sr20. geez
06-20-2005, 01:35 PM
#9
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,703
Originally posted by 2fast4y0u
the rb26 can rev to 9000? what the hell was i thinking about when i bought a sr20. geez
the rb26 can rev to 9000? what the hell was i thinking about when i bought a sr20. geez
06-20-2005, 02:23 PM
#10
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 609
What about F1 engines to a KA? F1 is only 3.0 with 10 cylinders that can rev to 16000rpm. Its only .6 more liters I ALMOST HAVE AN F1 ENGINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
06-20-2005, 02:37 PM
#11
Contributing Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Here and there, mostly here.
Posts: 2,383
WOO HOO!!!!!!!!
06-20-2005, 05:51 PM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: for you to ask....PM me
Posts: 330
Originally posted by slepper13
the rb has 6 cylinders ka has 4. rb has a little more displacement. so if u bolted on a turbo on ka it would up with the rb. the ka has better torque for its size.
the rb has 6 cylinders ka has 4. rb has a little more displacement. so if u bolted on a turbo on ka it would up with the rb. the ka has better torque for its size.
06-21-2005, 01:10 PM
#13
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waterford, Ca
Posts: 2,863
This thread is great....but I know my KA will KILL an Rb. It has an intake 
06-21-2005, 01:54 PM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brunswick
Posts: 394
O deffinately if you put like an intake filter even youll be able to smoke the RBs and probably rev faster, hell itll even sound better...hahahhahahhahahhahahahaha. God i love newbs
06-21-2005, 06:47 PM
#15
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,703
the type )2 badges on my intake make it faster than NOS!!!
