2F2F DVD Question
#1
2F2F DVD Question
Ok this has been buggin me for a little while now. After gettin a reply I'm probably gonna feel like an idiot, but I have to ask anyways. If you have the 2f2f dvd and have watched the "turbo-charged prelude" or whatever, is paul walker's first car, the red one not the skyline, a 240?
#2
umm, wrong boards to mention 2fast... lol, most 'real' racers hate that movie... I'm by no means a real racer or drifter... Like the movie cause of the artistic flare on the cars (and the skyline).... but that's besides the point,
It was a Mitsubishi 3000gt. 515a I think. I used drive a stealth and knew the owner from a board (or a guy that clamed to be, and posted picks way before the prelude was mentioned)... to me that car looked ugly... to much done to the already clean body lines of the GTO...
Should've put the pitt road M kit on... so lovely... but a tuner's car not the movie's art department creation.
to much information huh?
It was a Mitsubishi 3000gt. 515a I think. I used drive a stealth and knew the owner from a board (or a guy that clamed to be, and posted picks way before the prelude was mentioned)... to me that car looked ugly... to much done to the already clean body lines of the GTO...
Should've put the pitt road M kit on... so lovely... but a tuner's car not the movie's art department creation.
to much information huh?
#4
i just bought it 2 nights ago...i'll check for you....give me a sec..
and yeah both the movies arent the greatest piece of work and true racers who are out on the track all the time wouldnt appreciate them....but me...i'm a guy without as much money...working on my ****...i waited 6 months for the fast and the furious to come out...and the first day it was out i saw it 2 times....and a third time on a later date...i bought the dvd the first day it was out...WHY..???? because its the only movie that really has anything to do with cars. i loved gone in 60 seconds too...but fast and the furious is better...
and in my opinion the first one is better...although the second one has more of a plot...it's too computer generated..
and yeah both the movies arent the greatest piece of work and true racers who are out on the track all the time wouldnt appreciate them....but me...i'm a guy without as much money...working on my ****...i waited 6 months for the fast and the furious to come out...and the first day it was out i saw it 2 times....and a third time on a later date...i bought the dvd the first day it was out...WHY..???? because its the only movie that really has anything to do with cars. i loved gone in 60 seconds too...but fast and the furious is better...
and in my opinion the first one is better...although the second one has more of a plot...it's too computer generated..
#5
Originally posted by fist
i just bought it 2 nights ago...i'll check for you....give me a sec..
and yeah both the movies arent the greatest piece of work and true racers who are out on the track all the time wouldnt appreciate them....but me...i'm a guy without as much money...working on my ****...i waited 6 months for the fast and the furious to come out...and the first day it was out i saw it 2 times....and a third time on a later date...i bought the dvd the first day it was out...WHY..???? because its the only movie that really has anything to do with cars. i loved gone in 60 seconds too...but fast and the furious is better...
and in my opinion the first one is better...although the second one has more of a plot...it's too computer generated..
i just bought it 2 nights ago...i'll check for you....give me a sec..
and yeah both the movies arent the greatest piece of work and true racers who are out on the track all the time wouldnt appreciate them....but me...i'm a guy without as much money...working on my ****...i waited 6 months for the fast and the furious to come out...and the first day it was out i saw it 2 times....and a third time on a later date...i bought the dvd the first day it was out...WHY..???? because its the only movie that really has anything to do with cars. i loved gone in 60 seconds too...but fast and the furious is better...
and in my opinion the first one is better...although the second one has more of a plot...it's too computer generated..
#6
it is a 3000gt i'm sure of it...there was no car before it...
there was him rembering about giving the keys for his supra to DOM...that was the only other car pictured..
i tried to find some pics...these are some i came up with...hopefully they work...cuz i'm remote linking them
there was him rembering about giving the keys for his supra to DOM...that was the only other car pictured..
i tried to find some pics...these are some i came up with...hopefully they work...cuz i'm remote linking them
#7
Well, F&F is more about our cars, whereas 60 seconds is moreso about american muscle cars & luxury vehicles. I like looking more @ cars like those than luxury cars and mustangs, but thats just me. If nothing else, it's always a good time to make fun of them.
Dr.
Dr.
#9
Originally posted by drnovascotia
Well, F&F is more about our cars, whereas 60 seconds is moreso about american muscle cars & luxury vehicles. I like looking more @ cars like those than luxury cars and mustangs, but thats just me. If nothing else, it's always a good time to make fun of them.
Dr.
Well, F&F is more about our cars, whereas 60 seconds is moreso about american muscle cars & luxury vehicles. I like looking more @ cars like those than luxury cars and mustangs, but thats just me. If nothing else, it's always a good time to make fun of them.
Dr.
#12
gone in 60 isnt that great...
MOVIE wise...it had a better plot then both...it was all good that way...
but i can relate more to the fast and the furious series...and i just like to see OUR kinda cars goin around bein raced and stuff..
MOVIE wise...it had a better plot then both...it was all good that way...
but i can relate more to the fast and the furious series...and i just like to see OUR kinda cars goin around bein raced and stuff..
#13
ok, i can kinda see that from a content standpoint. i suppose, sad as it is to say, fnf does touch a lil closer to home as far as the cars involved (although i'd probably have better luck owning any of the cars in gone in 60 than an "$80,000 dsm" ). still, from a quality standpoint, i'd have to say that gone in 60 leaves tire tracks on fnf's back.
#15
Originally posted by fist
maybe it's because i'm 19
old cars dont really interest me...
maybe it's because i'm 19
old cars dont really interest me...