General For General 240sx/Silvia (s-chassis) discussions.

BATLground 350Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2003 | 09:54 PM
  #1  
poweraddict's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7
From: ATL, GA
BATLground 350Z

rb26dett(skyline motor) in a 350z.


Old Apr 8, 2003 | 10:01 PM
  #2  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
Damn..... That is impressive. Is it just me or does that engine bay look a little narrow?
Old Apr 8, 2003 | 10:03 PM
  #3  
poweraddict's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7
From: ATL, GA
Yeah, it was close, but we made it work. The swap is going well, figured I would let you Nissan guys, know some new news.
Old Apr 8, 2003 | 10:06 PM
  #4  
-HyJynX-'s Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,109
From: Pasadena,ca
wow thx for the news! all i gatta say is holy ****..and ur right it is a bit narrow, then again the car in general is pretty small. time to save those pics=)

Last edited by -HyJynX-; Apr 8, 2003 at 10:12 PM.
Old Apr 9, 2003 | 02:49 AM
  #5  
s14brent's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 72
From: las vegas
holy hell...that is awesome....
Old Apr 9, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #6  
DETurbine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 91
From: Omaha
Dam ........I can't believe you fit that in there. Are you going with a single turbo upgrade or staying with the twin? show us a picture when you get the turbo(s) in there if you could I would love to see that. You have 100% props from me .
Old Apr 9, 2003 | 11:55 AM
  #7  
poweraddict's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7
From: ATL, GA
single turbo is coming soon
Old Apr 9, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #8  
dokutake's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10
From: Los Angeles
Lookin' good. The inline engine looks like it has plenty of space on the sides of a V6 engine bay. If you ask me though, I'd rather stick one of those in a G35, and turn it into a REAL skyline.
Old Apr 9, 2003 | 09:46 PM
  #9  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
I wonder how this will affect the handing since it's no longer front-mid engine. Also what would you say is the weight difference between the VQ and the RB?
Old Apr 10, 2003 | 06:32 AM
  #10  
spitz7985's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 709
i'm confused as to why you would do that. i think the VQ is a better engine than the RB. i mean, its got the same hp rating, and its naturally aspirated.



what angle do the two banks join on the VQ?
Old Apr 10, 2003 | 07:28 AM
  #11  
altima/240sx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 285
From: phoenix, AZ..SD cali
it may have the same HP, but the RB can handle alot more power. just upgrade the Turbos and the Intercooler and you will spank any VQ
Old Apr 10, 2003 | 01:52 PM
  #12  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
Originally posted by altima/240sx
it may have the same HP, but the RB can handle alot more power.
How would you know this? The VQ is just starting being tuned by the aftermarket.
Old Apr 10, 2003 | 01:58 PM
  #13  
altima/240sx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 285
From: phoenix, AZ..SD cali
the RB has been proven, until someone proves the VQ, im sticking to that
Old Apr 10, 2003 | 01:59 PM
  #14  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
In the meantime don't make conclusions based on zero information.
Old Apr 10, 2003 | 02:08 PM
  #15  
altima/240sx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 285
From: phoenix, AZ..SD cali
your so mean but, until greddy or Blitz whichever one is making the turbo for the VQ gives me some numbers, Im sticking to my opinion. But lets see what happens from the a stock RB26DETT vs a trubo'd VQ motor and see which holds up better.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:32 AM.