General For General 240sx/Silvia (s-chassis) discussions.

SR20DET or RB20DET?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2005, 04:09 AM
  #16  
Contributing Member
 
lrb_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 609
you can run 15psi on a sr20det safely I heard... which would be around 250whp i'd imagine... and probably 17psi on the rb20det and get around 275-300whp? do a search, i'm too lazy lol.
lrb_2000 is offline  
Old 08-24-2005, 07:24 AM
  #17  
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
BigVinnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Walnut Creek
Posts: 2,502
Originally posted by Waynehead05
technology replaces displacement...
UHHHHH you are joking right????? The only modern update that the rb20 and the 3rd production sr20det have are CVET technology. That is nothing new, and it only shifts the power band, by advancing the cam and the TTP, it's called a 5HP gain even if boosted. The internal combustion engine has gone unchanged. Displacement will always kill lower displacement engines on any level.. OH talk about engineering didn't the CA come with cvet. Why is it the KA was made after the CA, are you calling Nissan engineers stupid????????
Why the hell did Nissan make the QR25de with cvet?? It simply put the sr to it's grave.............

Last edited by BigVinnie; 08-24-2005 at 09:43 AM.
BigVinnie is offline  
Old 08-24-2005, 08:57 AM
  #18  
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
BigVinnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Walnut Creek
Posts: 2,502
Originally posted by lrb_2000
you can run 15psi on a sr20det safely I heard... which would be around 250whp i'd imagine... and probably 17psi on the rb20det and get around 275-300whp?
Those are all myths. Injection and cams have to be upgraded before achieving anything close to running it "safe". Then you would also have to concider the engine management which would also need a good upgrade......
BigVinnie is offline  
Old 08-24-2005, 09:16 AM
  #19  
Contributing Member
 
Slidin240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paterson, NJ
Posts: 1,415
O/T

Nice Onevia Vinnie
Slidin240 is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 09:07 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
GearShifter240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10
Basicly to pick which engine is better for the swap.. it actually dpeneds on what you plan on doing with the car... if its going to be a daily drive car... then its going to be the SR but if its going to be a project car then its going to be the RB... I personally would go for the SR...
~Did i get it right?... SR for daily drive and RB for project... always get those mixed up..
GearShifter240 is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 10:22 PM
  #21  
Contributing Member
 
Waynehead05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,110
Originally posted by GearShifter240
Basicly to pick which engine is better for the swap.. it actually dpeneds on what you plan on doing with the car... if its going to be a daily drive car... then its going to be the SR but if its going to be a project car then its going to be the RB... I personally would go for the SR...
~Did i get it right?... SR for daily drive and RB for project... always get those mixed up..
if you keep the motor near stock it doesn't matter. you have to order parts for both engines anyway. if you are going to boost on stock internals... it doesn't matter. if you are going to mod it to hell and back... ?
Waynehead05 is offline  
Old 09-09-2005, 04:24 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
GearShifter240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10
Waynehead05... So if i am planning on moding it... the SR should be the one that i should go with right?... or would the RB be better if im moding it?...planning on daily driving btw
GearShifter240 is offline  
Old 09-09-2005, 04:50 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
KerosineK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: in the clouds
Posts: 381
Originally posted by GearShifter240
Waynehead05... So if i am planning on moding it... the SR should be the one that i should go with right?... or would the RB be better if im moding it?...planning on daily driving btw
If you are going to mod it either way, you are better off with the SR because of the abundance of parts, the parts will also probably be cheaper.
KerosineK is offline  
Old 09-09-2005, 04:54 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
GearShifter240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10
Oh ok... Thanks Kero!... SR!!!!... Umm sorry if i did that off someones topic...
GearShifter240 is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:36 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
precisionelite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 5
What are the technical differences between the SR20DET and the RB20DET? I've heard the RB20DET has stronger internals, and an Iron Oil pan, but not much aside from that.

Personally when I get my 240 i'm leaning toward the RB20. I think if you race it hard the RB20DET will hold up longer because of it's much shorter stroke.
-Greg
precisionelite is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:15 PM
  #26  
Contributing Member
 
CowboyTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,703
RB has stronger internals because it's built to push more power (2 more cylinders, bigger turbo~ obviously) It may have a shorter stroke, but then again it also has more moving parts. Not to mention there's generally an inverse proportion between hp and reliability...
CowboyTurbo is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 10:44 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
precisionelite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 5
Let's say you blow a headgasket or break a valve or need a new water pump for the RB20DET...where would you find these? I know it will be harder than the SR but I hope not impossibly so. This is the main factor limiting my decision.

Also with regard to the stroke: I do realize that the number of moving parts is a factor in the equation. However, so far as the RB series is concerned less stroke is going to equal slower piston speeds so less stress on the entire motor would result.
I'm not sure if there would be less stress at a certain rpm compared to the SR though because there are more moving parts. I can tell you this the SR has the exact same bore and stroke as a K20a. Being a Honda Guy first, with that bore & stroke you should be able to rev it quite high. You can rev K20a's to 8500 RPM max until you need stronger rods. However there are many factors involved.
precisionelite is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 05:21 PM
  #28  
Contributing Member
 
CowboyTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,703
Originally posted by precisionelite
there are many factors involved.
Exactly. You gotta ask the right questions to get the right answers.
CowboyTurbo is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 06:24 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
precisionelite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 5
Are there any sites that sell RB20DET Parts? (I.E. water pumps, pistons, oil pumps, bearings,etc)
precisionelite is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 07:23 PM
  #30  
Contributing Member
 
CowboyTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,703
www.rbmotoring.com for some parts, but to answer your question, yes. There are numerous sites where you can find RB parts. it's just going to have to take some old-fashioned effort to find...
CowboyTurbo is offline  


Quick Reply: SR20DET or RB20DET?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:04 AM.