General For General 240sx/Silvia (s-chassis) discussions.

Stock 1/4 time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #1  
birgir185's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 88
From: Iceland
Stock 1/4 time

what kind of times will an s14 run? how about a manual?
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 07:58 PM
  #2  
*Tx_BLooD_240*'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 206
From: Austin,TX
16's 17's i think
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #3  
Fast1One's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,863
From: Waterford, Ca
http://metawire.org/~nomel/car_times_quartermile.htm

May be in there somwhere....
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 05:25 AM
  #4  
ZenkiOwns's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 191
From: SouthCarolina
1993 Nissan 240SX SE 8.4 16.3
1989 Nissan 240SX 8.8 16.5
1990 Nissan 240SX SE 8.8 16.5
1993 Nissan 240SX Convertible 9.6 17.3

No S14 listed as far as I saw
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #5  
Kaion1000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 165
From: Connecticut
Originally posted by ZenkiOwns

No S14 listed as far as I saw

1995 Nissan 240SX SE 8.3 16.1
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 09:53 AM
  #6  
Atown 240's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 513
From: Illinois
i ran a 17.7 it sucked a nut lol
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 03:40 PM
  #7  
PsYkHoTiC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 50
From: Nor Cal, The 510
1989 Nissan 240SX 8.8 16.5
1990 Nissan 240SX SE 8.8 16.5
1991 Nissan 240SX SE 7.9 16.1
1993 Nissan 240SX Convertible 9.6 17.3
1993 Nissan 240SX SE 8.4 16.3
1995 Nissan 240SX SE 8.3 16.1
1995 Nissan 240SX SE-R 8.0 15.8
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 04:16 PM
  #8  
Fast1One's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,863
From: Waterford, Ca
^^^That SER must have been a misprint...
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #9  
Chillin240's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 19
From: K-Town TX
my 95 ran a 16.7 (manual) but it was my fault. 1st time ever at the track and i had a 1+ second reaction time (wasn't paying attention)
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:20 AM
  #10  
ghostman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 156
From: Illinois
well now i feel better. i ran 16.2 stock (95 manual). i saw 15.7 listed somewhere for stock. that seemed a little too low.
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #11  
Biggamehit's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,091
From: Misawa, Japan
i have a 95 KA in my 89

i ran a 15.8 with basic blot ons and poormans mods and good drivign skill.

my fastest reaction time that day was .507

ps i was into drag befor Auto X lol

also dont burn rubber on street tires, doesnt help, looks cool though
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #12  
Chillin240's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 19
From: K-Town TX
I have a friend with a 96 that ran 15.8 with intake, exhaust, and short shifter. So I suppose 15.7 isnt TOOOOO low?
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #13  
Chillin240's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 19
From: K-Town TX
racing_kid: if you beat him on the streets i dont think thats a good measurement for how fast your car is... i beat a turbo civic (stock internals, 5 psi) when my car was stock

the driver couldnt drive though. I know because he was a friend of mine that just bought the car haha

PS street racing is bad
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 04:44 PM
  #14  
Biggamehit's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,091
From: Misawa, Japan
16.2 official car and driver times for 95

these are from someone eles
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

Last edited by Biggamehit; Oct 27, 2005 at 04:52 PM.
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 04:54 PM
  #15  
Biggamehit's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,091
From: Misawa, Japan
----------------------



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:07 AM.