NA Motor Discussions regarding N/A KA24E, KA24DE, and SR20DE

More reliable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #1  
NismoKa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 93
From: Kelowna, CA
More reliable?

Are the SR series engines a lot more reliable than the KA's?

I know some car manufacturers have what are to be known as bulletproof engines like the 2JZ yota.

What is nissans in your guys opinions?
Old May 20, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #2  
ProjectMy240's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 393
From: Reading,PA 19606
KA's are deff. bulletproof cast iron baby!

sr20 mmm i can't really compare it to a ka. i don't know anything about sr's and I don't wanna know anything about sr's i'm not too big on the sr's..... but i would say ca18det is more reliable then sr hehe cuz yep its cast iron baby.
Old May 22, 2005 | 11:34 PM
  #3  
l2aine's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,587
From: Socal, 909/626
SR is aluminum head, aluminum block - compared to the cast iron KA. My vote goes to KA, and once someone says "SR's make more HP" consider how much $ you'd need to match HP numbers with both cars.

It's like people saying Honda motors are strong... sure - after you get a block guard, change pistons and rods, etc.
Old May 23, 2005 | 12:05 AM
  #4  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
Why do you assume the SR's aluminum block makes it less reliable? Why not pick something like the rocker arms? But in any case it'll fail cause of the owner beats on it. All I can think of for real reliablity is the undersquare design of the KA would lead to excessive wear in high rpm's. But look how long they live anyway.
Old May 23, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #5  
LA_phantom_240's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,550
From: Slidell, LA
yeah the turbo puts hella strain on the motor. Of course, the motor was built to hold these, but in the long run, go KA. KA power ownz joo!
Old May 23, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #6  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
Originally posted by LA_phantom_240
yeah the turbo puts hella strain on the motor.
How?
Old May 23, 2005 | 07:55 PM
  #7  
LA_phantom_240's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,550
From: Slidell, LA
more boost and fuel means more work that has to be done, which means more heat... heat = strain. Its easier to compress gas and air at normal pressure than it is to compress it at 10 psi or whatever.
Old May 23, 2005 | 08:02 PM
  #8  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
And how does any of that effect the reliability at all? All that heat is easily managed by the stock cooling equipment. Turbo's do not automatically reduce reliability look at tractor trailers... they'll do over 1 million miles with a **** load more boost and "strain." Turbo volvos, mercedes, vw's... I have seen go much farther than any nissan, turbo or not..... So, I say any furthur discussion on this topic is just gonna be pulled out said poster's ***.
Old May 23, 2005 | 08:21 PM
  #9  
LA_phantom_240's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,550
From: Slidell, LA
Uh no if you look at the construction and materials used in said applications, youll see why they last so long...
Old May 24, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #10  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
And just what magical materials and manufacturing techniques have they been using for so many years?
Old May 24, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #11  
LA_phantom_240's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,550
From: Slidell, LA
its how they design and machine the block and how they bore the cylinders, how they design the water pump. its every single variable down to the very position of things. Why do you think when you look at electric fans, there are like 1000 different designs? cuz some work better than others. Theres a reason some cars are outrageously expensive.
Old May 24, 2005 | 07:14 PM
  #12  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
So you don't know..... And by the description you gave I guess the SR is more reliable than the KA? I mean you yourself said iron must be better earlier, but I believe it's common practice in all the outragously expensive (for a reason remember) cars to use aluminum.... I mean hell atleast it's harder to warp the head on a SR...
Old May 24, 2005 | 07:18 PM
  #13  
LA_phantom_240's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,550
From: Slidell, LA
theyre about the same as far as reliability, but i would put my money on the KA cuz its ultra stout and iron
Old May 24, 2005 | 07:25 PM
  #14  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
What's stout about it and why do you think the iron will make a better engine?
Old May 24, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #15  
LA_phantom_240's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,550
From: Slidell, LA
because iron can withstand more force than some of the other metals



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 AM.