300zx vs 240sx
300zx vs 240sx
or a 95'-96' 240sx
07-12-2004, 08:31 PM
#4
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 515
well thats a toughy, better in what category? if you mean speed wise, obviuosly that would be the 300zx, because i believe or been told it has 2 turbos....but overall id prefer a 95 240sx
07-13-2004, 10:46 AM
#6
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 3,122
I think a stock 240 has a better suspension. But a 300 has a bigge block size, so they cant be compaired speed wize. I mean, if you have never seen either car and you had to chose one which would you choose?
07-13-2004, 03:19 PM
#8
Contributing Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Covina/ Irvine
Posts: 2,515
Dude, no contest, the Z32 with the VG30DETT. Can't beat 300hp and 250 ft-lbs of torque. Raw power. That car is still a beauty today, and very tunable. Hard to work on, but the parts exist. I wanna get one later on. Get a 2+2 and convert it to twin turbo. It's been done before. It's gonna be an awesome track car.
BTW, looks-wise, it's a beautiful car. Awesome curves, low to the ground, wide, and it's a full blown sports car. That car was made for the track. The 240Sx is just it's baby brother.
BTW, looks-wise, it's a beautiful car. Awesome curves, low to the ground, wide, and it's a full blown sports car. That car was made for the track. The 240Sx is just it's baby brother.
Last edited by ArticDragon; 07-13-2004 at 05:04 PM.
07-14-2004, 08:36 PM
#12
Contributing Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Covina/ Irvine
Posts: 2,515
Originally posted by -HyJynX-
I take that person, lol
I take that person, lol
