Off-Topic Anything Non-Related to the above topics.

350z vs. s2000 vs. STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2005 | 07:13 AM
  #16  
phreze's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 831
From: In a 240 near you
Costs:
Evo VIII/RS $30,000
Evo MR $35,000
WRX STi $34,000
RX8 (221hp) $26,000
S2000 $28,000
350Z $26,000-32,000
G35 Coupe $31,000
Old May 21, 2005 | 08:08 AM
  #17  
CowboyTurbo's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,703
From: MA
I pick D: All of the above!
Old May 21, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #18  
2fast4y0u's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,254
From: Chicago area
evo8 is nimble and fast, also quoted as a bullet proof engine.
sti looks nice but expensive for aftermarket parts
s2000 very nimble in corners but its still a honda!
350z: my friend has one and its not slow at all lets just put it that way. i have an sr20det with a list of extras, im running stock boost and we raced,,,the outcome was dead even. i won because the front of my car is longer than his and he we were door to do at the finish line.

so all in all. 350z for out of the box performance.
Old May 21, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #19  
M374llic4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 78
From: BoostGetsYouLaid
I drove the STi in the back parking lot, as i work at a dealer, it was limited space, but the car had intake and exhaust and upgraded turbo, not sure what else, but i knew it had others, which is why we couldent sell it.

And I got to take the gold edition S2000 on the highway, got it up to 130 between exits.

The STi is a ****ing beast when it comes to acceleration, once you jam the pedal, and the turbo spools, I couldent even force my self forward, and my buddy in the passanger seat nearly **** him self.

IMO the STi is one of teh best performing cars for the money, It is a crazy powerful ride. <3<3
Old May 21, 2005 | 11:58 PM
  #20  
phreze's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 831
From: In a 240 near you
Evo feels much more aggresive then sti, but with an intake, exhuast, and upgraded turbo your looking at another 100+ hp to the wheels making the comparision null and void. Stock wise its different, just as it would be to upgrade all of that on any car.
Old May 22, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #21  
LA_phantom_240's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,550
From: Slidell, LA
well the 350z is a porker, the s2k has a 2 liter motor, and the sti is a 4 door. Hmmm... ill take hidden option 3 : a 1991 nissan 240sx LE fastback ... woot

****tagged by a post *********
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FOSINGWO
For Sale - Cars For Sale
1
Jan 20, 2009 03:46 AM
papaganoushh
Show and Shine
9
Sep 19, 2006 06:25 PM
DARKEST_HOUR
General
5
Oct 17, 2005 12:41 PM
twofortyessex
Off-Topic
16
Mar 31, 2004 09:56 AM
imagin3
General
6
Jun 16, 2003 08:12 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:07 AM.