Sup everyone,

I've been here only as a guest for the past 2 years and finally had my lazy @ss sign up. Anyways.. I wanted to know which 240 is best to start out with [fastback versions 89-94]? Is the SE version always a plus above the standard? Because all I really see different from the two is the HP and Torque and some few luxuries such as moonroof and rearshield wipers. I'll probably tune this badboy up once I get it.. but just on the curious side... which one it better?

Thanks.

 

u should probably go with a 91-93 fastback SE. The 91-94 240s r dohc thats y..

 

what about 94?

94 is still s13 right?

 

'94 was all convertables.

 

and all auto's

 

yea...94 is the year of the lost 240

 

I'd say '99.

 

...lol 94 is for the S13...99 for the S14 lol

 

yea... I figured.. DOHC is better than SOHC... but I remember somewhere reading in a forum like this, was that it was better to turbo a the KA24E rather than the KA24DE... go fig.... btw thanks. freakin HyJynx all over the forum! lol keep it up

 

lol yep, im all over these forums haha...its my second home lol

 

There is no engine differences between SE, LE, and base trims, provided a given year. Only between 1989-90 240SX's, which used 140hp SOHC engines, and 1991-94 240SX's, which used 155hp DOHC engines.

 

my '90 240sx (~250K, slippy clutch, barely starting, quarter panel bashed) has seen better days and i think its time to start anew. Do you think it woud be better for me to go with a newer 97-98 240 or to stick with the s13 and get one in better condition that what i've got? I've driven other cars and nothing in my book can match my 240

 

Go with wutever u really want, id love to have a kouki S14

 

well i'm definitely gettin a '98 now so i got that figured out, what kinda money would it take to make the kouki s14? (parts, etc.)

 

'98 IS the kouki S14.