Safe boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #16  
Biggamehit's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,091
From: Misawa, Japan
i have never owned an SR. but i can find the answer.

http://www.drift-connection.com/sr20det-specs.php

  • Displacement: 1998cc (2.0 liter)
  • Cam Type: DOHC 16 valve, chain driven cam sprockets
  • Bore & Stroke 86mm x 86mm
  • Compression: 8.5:1
  • Horsepower: 205ps @ 6000rpm
  • Torque: 203 ft/lbs @ 4000rpm
  • Stock Boost: 7 psi
  • Throttle Body Bore: 60mm
  • Injector Size: 370cc/min
  • Turbo Specs:
  • Compressor: T-25, 60 trim 56mm BCI-1 compressor.
  • Turbine: T-25, 62 trim 53.8mm 0.64 A/R turbine housing.
  • Center Section: Journal bearings
  • Performance:
    The stock turbo will be safe to 13-15 psi. After that, the turbo is past its efficiency range, and power increases will fall off and are not worth the risk of turbo damage. The engine should produce 230-250 RWHP at safe boost.

Last edited by Biggamehit; Jul 8, 2007 at 02:54 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 02:37 PM
  #17  
battosaii930's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,312
From: Miami, FL
yep i ran my redtop at 15psi with np i only had fmic catback and an intake
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #18  
Jovan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 179
From: Landover, MD
Oh, so I should be good if I run 13psi with stock set-up with no prob? I also have a FMIC and 3" full exhaust. I plan to upgrade in a few months but I would like to boost more than 7 psi.

Good resource Bigg. Thanks.

Last edited by Jovan; Jul 8, 2007 at 03:16 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #19  
battosaii930's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,312
From: Miami, FL
oh if u have a 3" exhaust and a fmic then your boosting around 10psi
it only boost 7psi if u got stock everything but upgrading the IC and Exhaust accually makes u boost more

b4 i put my boost controller in i had intake, exhaust and fmic everything else stock i was boosting 9.9psi
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #20  
Jovan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 179
From: Landover, MD
Okay, that makes me feel better. I'm going to get a boost controller in a while so once I get that, i'll probably go to 13 psi. Thanks everyone, I really appreciate the help.
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 03:20 PM
  #21  
battosaii930's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,312
From: Miami, FL
like i said it wont be a problem i raced mine at the track at 15psi with np
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #22  
battosaii930's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,312
From: Miami, FL
i even got pics im the black s14 towards the bottom
http://www.club240.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39698
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 03:28 PM
  #23  
Torby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 32
From: Norway
It's not just about the boost, mate. But sure, the stock SR can handle 1.2 bar or even more. Just make sure you're not running lean. Detonation will kill any engine, forged pistons or not. Forged internals might last a little longer than stock if you get detonation, but it WILL break.

Some claim that a stock SR can handle 350 - 400 flywheel hp, with just upratet headgasket and perhaps cams. Better cams = more hp at lower boost.
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 03:35 PM
  #24  
battosaii930's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,312
From: Miami, FL
true but i didnt have that problem i was running really rich lol

also with injectors, turbo, cams, and stock head gasket with a tune can handle 400hp on stock internals
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #25  
Jovan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 179
From: Landover, MD
Most definetly. I have an A/F gauge to keep an eye on the mix and of course I have a walboro FP and Z32 fuel filter. I'm trying to save up money to upgrade the fuel and engine management so everything is totally straight.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 01:12 AM
  #26  
Biggamehit's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,091
From: Misawa, Japan
narrow band or wideband?
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 03:03 AM
  #27  
Jovan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 179
From: Landover, MD
I believe it's a narrow band. I haven't installed it yet. Is there a preference?
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 05:43 AM
  #28  
Biggamehit's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,091
From: Misawa, Japan
narrow band is as good as it looks bro. not very accurate at all for precise tuning. wideband is what you need. if you looking for something good and affordable NGK AGX is good bro, im about to pick it up.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 02:38 AM
  #29  
Jovan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 179
From: Landover, MD
If I use a wideband a/f meter, don't I have to use wideband 02 sensors?
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #30  
Biggamehit's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,091
From: Misawa, Japan
yeaup all of what you need comes with the wideband setup

of course your most popular on the market is aem ugeo, innovative etc

but there are many other options. you don't wanna go to cheap because you want the most accurate reading.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:53 AM.