Site Feedback and Suggestions If you have any suggestions or want to see something voice your opinion in here.

larger avatars?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2002 | 10:08 PM
  #1  
Sinfestboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 174
From: StL to Miami
larger avatars?

could we have a little bit larger avatars? atleast 100x100?
please? I dont think leanna scotts hottness can be expressed in 50x50 pixels...
Old Feb 5, 2002 | 09:24 PM
  #2  
Sykikchimp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 37
From: Charlotte, NC
I concur. 50x50 no good. 100x100 goood
Old Feb 7, 2002 | 04:56 PM
  #3  
mrdeucie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7
Re: larger avatars?

Originally posted by Sinfestboy
could we have a little bit larger avatars? atleast 100x100?
please? I dont think leanna scotts hottness can be expressed in 50x50 pixels...
why don't you guys just put the pics in your sig instead? I've never seen any avatars larger than 50x50 before.
Old Feb 7, 2002 | 06:15 PM
  #4  
PSM's Avatar
PSM
*****istrator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 263
From: MD
Ok well I changed it to 65x65. I think thats the max I'll go. Plus smaller avatars look nicer

As far as signatures, I disabled pics in signature because if everyone puts large pics in their sig then the poor people who still have dial-up connections will suffer.
Old Feb 7, 2002 | 06:59 PM
  #5  
Sykikchimp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 37
From: Charlotte, NC
ok, I can deal with that!
Old Feb 10, 2002 | 02:19 PM
  #6  
battlestylespl's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,061
From: Wisconsin Sucks
i think 100x100 would be better..not too big, not too small..then you can turn sig pics off
Old Feb 10, 2002 | 02:21 PM
  #7  
battlestylespl's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,061
From: Wisconsin Sucks
n/m...i didn't read far enough ...and i am on dialup..sigs don;t bother me
Old Feb 19, 2002 | 05:00 PM
  #8  
Sinfestboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 174
From: StL to Miami
www.streetracing.org

bigger avatars.

you cant put a decent pic of your car up on 50x50
Old Feb 23, 2002 | 04:24 PM
  #9  
EtrnalE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 79
u should just have the pics in ur sigs..to bad for the 56k peeps..or just limit the size
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 07:26 PM
  #10  
mrdeucie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7
Originally posted by PSM
Ok well I changed it to 65x65. I think thats the max I'll go. Plus smaller avatars look nicer

As far as signatures, I disabled pics in signature because if everyone puts large pics in their sig then the poor people who still have dial-up connections will suffer.
]

hey i'm not poor.
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 09:41 PM
  #11  
TLē's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 174
From: Fargo, ND
Originally posted by PSM
As far as signatures, I disabled pics in signature because if everyone puts large pics in their sig then the poor people who still have dial-up connections will suffer.
Huh???

Look in your user control panel.. the options are right there for any "poor dialup user" to select as he/she wishes..
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 11:38 PM
  #12  
battlestylespl's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,061
From: Wisconsin Sucks
Originally posted by TLē


Huh???

Look in your user control panel.. the options are right there for any "poor dialup user" to select as he/she wishes..
oh damn...TL is right, first time ever!, sup jordania
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RB20_RPS13
For Sale - Wanting To Buy (WTB) Or Trade (WTT)
0
Jun 4, 2013 05:56 PM
a_ahmed
Road Race/AutoX
4
Sep 12, 2007 12:24 PM
dued
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
10
Feb 7, 2006 01:30 PM
Jonas
Off-Topic
2
Nov 18, 2003 12:35 PM
Import Fanatix
General
2
Mar 10, 2002 04:41 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:20 AM.