General For General 240sx/Silvia (s-chassis) discussions.

Fuel economy?

Old Jun 9, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #31  
re037's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,358
From: east los (angeles)
change your o2 sensor lately? or tune up?

factory stock should be 22 city 27 hiway

Last edited by re037; Jun 9, 2007 at 12:47 PM.
Old Jun 9, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #32  
jramosthe1st!'s Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,324
From: kennewick wa.
Originally Posted by NiSmO Knight
For our normal applications, aluminum drive shafts would reduce the load needed to make each revolution. Less load, means engine doesnt work as hard to make the car go. Sorry, brain dead at the moment.

Carbon Fiber drive shafts... another story. Hear bad things about them. But the 350Z and G35 uses carbon fiber shafts and they work fine. Depends on who you get your CF shafts from.
i've read bad things about the cf shafts. but i'm more interested in knowing if the aluminum shafts are worth the money. i'm about done with the performance enhancing. now i'd like to focus on maximizing power transfer to the wheels.



Originally Posted by kouki98
Dude Where Are You People Getting The Mileages From I Only Average 23 City/highway
poor driving habits such as excessive acceleration and braking will reduce your mpg. as will stop and go city driving.

Last edited by jramosthe1st!; Jun 12, 2007 at 06:00 PM.
Old Jun 9, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #33  
BigVinnie's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,502
From: Walnut Creek
Originally Posted by kouki98
Dude Where Are You People Getting The Mileages From I Only Average 23 City/highway

actually your gas mileage is horrible because you have a gutted CAT. Your second O2 sensor isn't reading anything different from your first O2 sensor...
Big mistake for JOO!!
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 10:41 AM
  #34  
kouki98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7
well i do have a tune up im running ngk iridiums but i did the o2 sensor bypass so they wouldnt read the same, and the mileage acutally went up a little when i removed the cat lol
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 10:50 AM
  #35  
BigVinnie's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,502
From: Walnut Creek
Originally Posted by kouki98
well i do have a tune up im running ngk iridiums but i did the o2 sensor bypass so they wouldnt read the same, and the mileage acutally went up a little when i removed the cat lol
Now what I am about to say isn't to attack you in any viscous way, I am just here to bring about truth and factual information.

Never heard of the O2 sensor bypass mind explaining? I've worked on Nissan KA24de OBD2's for a while and never heard of a bypass, that actually works. Don't know how your passing without throwing code either or running rich since the second sensor diagnosis the byproducts that are converted after the CAT.

The design of OBD2 was to make every part of the engine fail safe so that if something was to fail it could be fixed immediately without damaging the environment. The second O2 sensor was really designed for when the CAT was to fail, or in your case for people like you that extrude and hollow out the CAT. There is no way around it that is how it was designed and there is no such thing as the O2 sensor bypass.

BTW I know what your about to say next. This is the biggest scam on ebay right now..
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Oxyge...QQcmdZViewItem

What you can use is an actual simulator and they vary on sensor and car type and run anywhere from $30.00 to $100.00. There not cheap.
http://webstore.o2simulator.com/inde...&ProdID=5&HS=1
Just to make a note: the simulators are for off road use and the simulation may affect and vary from car to car making some engines run richer than others. There is no guarantee and they don't function as well as the actual sensor since they don't pick up the actual signal that is produced from the sensor.

Since the topic is about fuel economy here it is in a nutshell!!!!
Gutting out your CAT converter will also decrease gas mileage. The EGR BPT system was designed to pull gasses from the exhaust system into the intake manifold system to decrease NOX, and inlet air, in return this shrinks injector pulse width which overall conserves fuel. This effect can only happen with back pressure that happens through the catylitic conversion process. With out the back pressure of the CAT there is little to few gasses bypassing through the intake system so infact you decrease your fuel economy either way.
I always recommend high flow cats.They are safe for the environment as well as free up HP, and conserving fuel economy.
If your turbo charged thats an entirely different format where the restriction of the CAT decreases power output, but for natural aspiration it is an incentive to use when you want fuel economy and power.

Last edited by BigVinnie; Jun 12, 2007 at 12:24 PM.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 12:04 PM
  #36  
DriftX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 325
From: Franklin NC
to let you know, i was getting around 17mpg. My engine wasn't in the best shape at all. 156k miles and it looked like the oil had been changed maybe 10 times. Yikes.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 05:15 PM
  #37  
NiSmO Knight's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,432
From: Cali
Originally Posted by BigVinnie
Now what I am about to say isn't to attack you in any viscous way, I am just here to bring about truth and factual information.

Never heard of the O2 sensor bypass mind explaining? I've worked on Nissan KA24de OBD2's for a while and never heard of a bypass, that actually works. Don't know how your passing without throwing code either or running rich since the second sensor diagnosis the byproducts that are converted after the CAT.

The design of OBD2 was to make every part of the engine fail safe so that if something was to fail it could be fixed immediately without damaging the environment. The second O2 sensor was really designed for when the CAT was to fail, or in your case for people like you that extrude and hollow out the CAT. There is no way around it that is how it was designed and there is no such thing as the O2 sensor bypass.

BTW I know what your about to say next. This is the biggest scam on ebay right now..
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Oxyge...QQcmdZViewItem

What you can use is an actual simulator and they vary on sensor and car type and run anywhere from $30.00 to $100.00. There not cheap.
http://webstore.o2simulator.com/inde...&ProdID=5&HS=1
Just to make a note: the simulators are for off road use and the simulation may affect and vary from car to car making some engines run richer than others. There is no guarantee and they don't function as well as the actual sensor since they don't pick up the actual signal that is produced from the sensor.

Since the topic is about fuel economy here it is in a nutshell!!!!
Gutting out your CAT converter will also decrease gas mileage. The EGR BPT system was designed to pull gasses from the exhaust system into the intake manifold system to decrease NOX, and inlet air, in return this shrinks injector pulse width which overall conserves fuel. This effect can only happen with back pressure that happens through the catylitic conversion process. With out the back pressure of the CAT there is little to few gasses bypassing through the intake system so infact you decrease your fuel economy either way.
I always recommend high flow cats.They are safe for the environment as well as free up HP, and conserving fuel economy.
If your turbo charged thats an entirely different format where the restriction of the CAT decreases power output, but for natural aspiration it is an incentive to use when you want fuel economy and power.
Wow Vinnie... you remind me of my homie Henry from Motorsport Dynamics... both of you foos make me look like a nub...

Time for me to go outside and kick the rock around the yard again........
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #38  
BigVinnie's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,502
From: Walnut Creek
Originally Posted by NiSmO Knight
Wow Vinnie... you remind me of my homie Henry from Motorsport Dynamics... both of you foos make me look like a nub...

Time for me to go outside and kick the rock around the yard again........
I'm just a builder. I was tired of engineers making fun of me for not using correct terms, or being able to present a good presentation. I am what you call a back yard builder that does a lot of reading and research.
There is a book by HAYNES on engine management/OBD2 systems it is very interesting and many people should read it. It will give you answers as to why O2 sensor bypass is mumbo jumbo.

Heres what the book looks like you can get it for under $20.00.
Name:  Haynestech.jpg
Views: 16
Size:  89.0 KB

Last edited by BigVinnie; Jun 12, 2007 at 05:40 PM.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 06:50 PM
  #39  
kouki98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7
well i do understand what your saying and i didnt feel like you were attacking me in anyway. im probobly am running rich, although i am happy with the 23-24 i now get .since i was getting 17-20 for a while, im sure the other part of my problem is the fact im running 4.4:1 vlsd, and 205/50/16 instead of the 205/55/16 stock,

how ever i should have said tricked the ecu not bypass the o2 sensor, and the way i do that is something i learned from my qr25de days, its the double sparkplug non fouler, drill out one 1/2" for the o2 sensor to fit directly into and just leave the other alone, put both into the bung and your set, it just pulls the o2 out of enough that the ecu thinks there is a cat there and wont throw the code $2-5 bucks worth of parts no ebay bs
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 07:05 PM
  #40  
BigVinnie's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,502
From: Walnut Creek
Originally Posted by kouki98

how ever i should have said tricked the ecu not bypass the o2 sensor, and the way i do that is something i learned from my qr25de days, its the double sparkplug non fouler, drill out one 1/2" for the o2 sensor to fit directly into and just leave the other alone, put both into the bung and your set, it just pulls the o2 out of enough that the ecu thinks there is a cat there and wont throw the code $2-5 bucks worth of parts no ebay bs
Never tried that?
Anyways to the point, I can't preach that kind of information. All I can do is be direct with the information that is practical, and reliable. Every time some one installs an OBD1 HOTshot, OBX, or DC sports header on there OBD2 engine I have to explain in depth that they need an OBD1 cat and to transplant a bung 2" after the CAT for the second O2 sensor.This has become a routine for me. I try to keep information as practical as possible so it is easy for people to work around and it has structure to build off of.
Old Jun 29, 2007 | 01:43 PM
  #41  
DcrPrz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 96
From: Ellenton,Fl
how big is our gas tank(s14). Manual says 17gal, but I get to e fill it up and she only drinks 9gal!Is my gauge wrong or am i tfu??
Old Jun 29, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #42  
cracka Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 70
From: Ft.Benning Ga
just an update on my mileage. made a roughly 290 mile trip, mostly highway and got miles to the gallon, and i wasnt being very conservative. the rb20 continues to impress me
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 05:29 PM
  #43  
NiSmO Knight's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,432
From: Cali
Originally Posted by DcrPrz
how big is our gas tank(s14). Manual says 17gal, but I get to e fill it up and she only drinks 9gal!Is my gauge wrong or am i tfu??
Id say get a replacement for you fuel level sensor... whatever its called... I think it is 17 gal, I just filled up about 15 a couple days ago.

averaging 20.8 mpg with the heavy 350Z rims. Time to really save up more for lighter rims. But as of this month, Im dead broke due to smog and reg fees and all my other stupid bills...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rabbi
General
7
Dec 26, 2007 04:47 PM
Darryl
General
0
Jun 27, 2003 03:48 PM
RNN14
Private For Sale / Wanted
0
Feb 28, 2002 01:33 PM
Black97240sx
For Sale - Wanting To Buy (WTB) Or Trade (WTT)
6
Feb 20, 2002 09:10 PM
Dom
General
8
Feb 10, 2002 12:03 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:14 AM.