kk suckas, got my wang
07-17-2005, 01:05 PM
#61
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 680
I am glad we have gone through this exercise, because now I know that I can immediately dismiss anything you say as completely unbased.
You know nothing, yet claim to be an expert. You don;t even understand other people's concepts that you try to plagiarize.
Between your Pacesetter chambered exhaust and your fuel computer set to dump MORE fuel than the already rich factory program, you would definitely lose to a stock 240 with a 3" exhaust.
But avoid the dyno by all means. That way you never have to come to terms with the reality that your mods have cost you power.
I should have paid more attention to this forum... it seems that you've been spreading the misinfomation quite thick in my absence.
-Justin
You know nothing, yet claim to be an expert. You don;t even understand other people's concepts that you try to plagiarize.
Between your Pacesetter chambered exhaust and your fuel computer set to dump MORE fuel than the already rich factory program, you would definitely lose to a stock 240 with a 3" exhaust.
But avoid the dyno by all means. That way you never have to come to terms with the reality that your mods have cost you power.
I should have paid more attention to this forum... it seems that you've been spreading the misinfomation quite thick in my absence.
-Justin
07-17-2005, 01:07 PM
#62
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA.
Posts: 146
I smell bull****.
07-17-2005, 01:23 PM
#63
It's all good, this forum is based on your opinion as well as anybody else's.
Don't get "mad though". It only exposes your own ignorance, and you are retarded to state that you can use an SAFC on a HONDA, they don't even have MAFS. Accept for a few like the TSX and S2000.
Don't get "mad though". It only exposes your own ignorance, and you are retarded to state that you can use an SAFC on a HONDA, they don't even have MAFS. Accept for a few like the TSX and S2000.
07-17-2005, 01:29 PM
#64
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 680
Unfortunately for you, the forum is also based on fact.
What the heck are you talkign about not using the VAFC on a Honda? The biggest selling version of the thing is the VAFC which can also control VTEC.
Is it intended for the non-Hondas using Vtec?
If you are really this clueless, you should stop playing with your car before you break something.
-Justin
What the heck are you talkign about not using the VAFC on a Honda? The biggest selling version of the thing is the VAFC which can also control VTEC.
Is it intended for the non-Hondas using Vtec?
If you are really this clueless, you should stop playing with your car before you break something.
-Justin
07-17-2005, 01:38 PM
#65
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA.
Posts: 146
Hondas use Maps not Mafs and the safc can control both. But being a Pimp and a Tuner you must of already knew that.
07-17-2005, 01:58 PM
#66
Originally posted by Justin.b
Unfortunately for you, the forum is also based on fact.
What the heck are you talkign about not using the VAFC on a Honda? The biggest selling version of the thing is the VAFC which can also control VTEC.
Is it intended for the non-Hondas using Vtec?
If you are really this clueless, you should stop playing with your car before you break something.
-Justin
Unfortunately for you, the forum is also based on fact.
What the heck are you talkign about not using the VAFC on a Honda? The biggest selling version of the thing is the VAFC which can also control VTEC.
Is it intended for the non-Hondas using Vtec?
If you are really this clueless, you should stop playing with your car before you break something.
-Justin
You need to get your facts straight between the 2.
07-17-2005, 02:00 PM
#67
Originally posted by miked808
Hondas use Maps not Mafs and the safc can control both. But being a Pimp and a Tuner you must of already knew that.
Hondas use Maps not Mafs and the safc can control both. But being a Pimp and a Tuner you must of already knew that.
SAFC is for MAFS
VAFC is for MAPS
There both completly different piggy backs, in no way are they alike.
07-17-2005, 02:02 PM
#68
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 680
The only difference between the two is the VAFC's ability to control the VTEC engagement point.
So the first time I said VAFC, substitute SAFC... kind of like you substitue bullshat for information.
-Justin
So the first time I said VAFC, substitute SAFC... kind of like you substitue bullshat for information.
-Justin
07-17-2005, 02:07 PM
#69
Originally posted by Justin.b
The only difference between the two is the VAFC's ability to control the VTEC engagement point.
So the first time I said VAFC, substitute SAFC... kind of like you substitue bullshat for information.
-Justin
The only difference between the two is the VAFC's ability to control the VTEC engagement point.
So the first time I said VAFC, substitute SAFC... kind of like you substitue bullshat for information.
-Justin
If anything that is bullshiat.
07-17-2005, 02:17 PM
#70
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA.
Posts: 146
Knowledge 1
Vinnie 0
Vinnie 0
07-17-2005, 02:25 PM
#71
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 680
Originally posted by BigVinnie
The only thing I still see from you is your wack sticky and the useless information it still provides to this day.
If anything that is bullshiat.
The only thing I still see from you is your wack sticky and the useless information it still provides to this day.
If anything that is bullshiat.
-Justin
07-17-2005, 02:55 PM
#72
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 261
BigVinnie, you said you were done with this thread like 14 posts ago..
07-17-2005, 03:44 PM
#73
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 3,122
So is that a N1? I really want to get one. Who much you get yours for? Mmm:
07-17-2005, 06:45 PM
#74
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cape Cod, Ma.
Posts: 652
You guys are lucky my man Big V. is wasting his time arguing with you guys.
He wouldn't argue if he wasn't right ... he's been around for a while, tuning and what not, he's seen and done most of it. I think all he knows is cars, breathing, and typing.
He should be done with this thread, b/c you thick skulled kids can't seem to admit when someone has a good point.
He wouldn't argue if he wasn't right ... he's been around for a while, tuning and what not, he's seen and done most of it. I think all he knows is cars, breathing, and typing.
He should be done with this thread, b/c you thick skulled kids can't seem to admit when someone has a good point.
07-17-2005, 06:51 PM
#75
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 680
Originally posted by Cape 240
You guys are lucky my man Big V. is wasting his time arguing with you guys.
He wouldn't argue if he wasn't right ... he's been around for a while, tuning and what not, he's seen and done most of it. I think all he knows is cars, breathing, and typing.
He should be done with this thread, b/c you thick skulled kids can't seem to admit when someone has a good point.
You guys are lucky my man Big V. is wasting his time arguing with you guys.
He wouldn't argue if he wasn't right ... he's been around for a while, tuning and what not, he's seen and done most of it. I think all he knows is cars, breathing, and typing.
He should be done with this thread, b/c you thick skulled kids can't seem to admit when someone has a good point.
Nobody who has ever tuned a car for gains would buy an AFC to add fuel on a 240 program. Nor would they even attempt to tune one without a dyno run and a wideband.
He doesn't know what he's doing, really doesn't know what he's talking about and if I have to come off a little harsh to prevent someone from spending money based on his advice then I consider it worth the trade.
-Justin