Off-Topic Anything Non-Related to the above topics.

infinate smallness / infinate bigness theory

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 05:34 PM
  #1  
leiferik1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 692
From: AUSTIN BABY
infinate smallness / infinate bigness theory

okay, since you guys liked that one aliean theory i'll give you this one as well


umm....where to begin?

okay....i'll start off with atoms....


Atoms are the building blocks of EVERYTHING, you, me, the tea i'm drinking, the air.....EVERYTHING.....Inside of that atom is a nucleus, with electrons in orbit around it. (The molecule Oxygen has 8 electons in orbit)


Now think about how a galaxy is arranged, the sun in the center....with planets in orbit around it (our galaxy has 8 true planets)


well....and theres no way of actually checking my threory, but what if our ENTIRE galaxy was actually only a molecule of Oxygen being breathed in by some other creature who is at this moment looking out at the "stars".....which would mean that we are an atom of his body, he is an atom of another creatures body and so on.....
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 05:39 PM
  #2  
leiferik1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 692
From: AUSTIN BABY
now i'm not going to leave myself open to attacks, so i'll have to offer some "evidence"


to my theory you may ask, "how come electons are all the same size?" (ensinuating that all planets would be the same size as well)

well to this i would say, "electrons are ****ing small. distingushing size between them would be almost impossiable" and i would note that MANY planets ARE simular in size....like the earth and mars....and though some are a lot bigger (jupiter) the scale at which diameters of electons are measured is so insanely tiny that at present it is impossiable to accurately measure their exact size.
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 05:41 PM
  #3  
leiferik1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 692
From: AUSTIN BABY
i want to make people think. i want people to challenge me, in turn, making me think......so if your going to say you dont believe my theory, give me SPECIFIC REASONS why you dont....dont just say, "its full of holes" <-----(i was just poking fun, i'm not trying to be an *** so dont get upset)




i want to argue damn it.....i have stated my position......MAKE ME DEFEND IT!
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 06:27 PM
  #4  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
You forget about quarks... those little spiral thingys smally than atomic subparticles. Where would you say they fit in?Plus this post just reminded me of the unified theory that Einstien couldn't figure out and no one has yet... Well anyway the idea is that gravity pulls planets and any objects together and electromagnetism holds atoms together. Why then do these completely different properties do the same thing, but can't do the others job?
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 07:59 PM
  #5  
leiferik1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 692
From: AUSTIN BABY
Originally posted by I'm with Stupid
You forget about quarks... Where would you say they fit in?Plus this post just reminded me of the unified theory that Einstien couldn't figure out and no one has yet... Well anyway the idea is that gravity pulls planets and any objects together and electromagnetism holds atoms together. Why then do these completely different properties do the same thing, but can't do the others job?

where are quarks located?
inside the nucleus...more specificly....they make up protons and neutrons.

yeah yeah yeah you've got me on this point, its one of only a few that is REALLY hard for me to defend, but i can still try.

first of all, and this will have to be my strongest arguement...quarks have yet to be proven. they still only exist in theory (heres stanfords site on them if you wanna check http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/quarks.html)

so we know they are there....they just haven't been proven



seriously though, they make up protons and neutrons which are located inside of the nucleus....and according to my theory they would be INSIDE of the sun. which would make them what, fuel? afterall, the sun is bacically nothing more than necular reactions happening over and over again.




and i can't really say anything about the Unified Field Theory because it deals with quantum mechanics, and i know nothing of quantum mechanics
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 08:33 PM
  #6  
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,841
From: NY
So if you say the nucleus is the sun then if we leave the solar system, we leave the atom?
Old Feb 12, 2003 | 10:54 PM
  #7  
leiferik1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 692
From: AUSTIN BABY
Originally posted by I'm with Stupid
So if you say the nucleus is the sun then if we leave the solar system, we leave the atom?
basically yeah
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
klutchkhemist
West Coast/Hawaii
0
Sep 18, 2007 05:03 PM
klutchkhemist
West Coast/Hawaii
1
Aug 25, 2007 11:18 PM
Meow
Private For Sale / Wanted
0
Apr 13, 2005 05:22 PM
leiferik1
Off-Topic
30
Jun 11, 2003 08:28 PM
badass240sx
Off-Topic
59
Oct 20, 2002 09:14 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:45 PM.